Client ghosted after the quote? A 3-message follow-up
2026-10-24
Silence after a quote feels like a verdict. Most of the time it is not one: the person got busy, the quote arrived at a bad moment, and answering it became a small task they kept postponing. A follow-up sequence is how you find out which of those it is.
Silence is a deferred decision, not a no
An ignored quote is rarely a rejection. It is a decision that got moved to "later". The only way to bring it forward is to make the next step smaller than the last one you asked for, and to give it a deadline.
There are two kinds of silence and they look identical from your phone. One is a no the client is too polite to send. The other is a yes that has not happened yet. The sequence below is not designed to convert the first — nothing converts the first — it is designed to find the second quickly, and to stop you paying for the first.
Why 24 to 48 hours, and not "whenever"
Send the first follow-up while the visit is still in their head. A week later you are competing with whatever they did instead, and the reply you get is usually an apology rather than a booking. The gaps then widen on purpose — day 2, day 5, day 12 — so each message reads as a separate thought from a person, not as step three of an automated campaign.
Day 2 — the reminder
Short, no apology, one question. It assumes the quote was fine and the timing was not.
Hi [Name], just checking the [3 bedroom] quote landed. Still happy to do [Tue 9am] — want me to hold it?
Day 5 — remove the decision
Now cut the thing they are hesitating about. If it is money, reduce the scope rather than the price. If it is timing, offer one alternative. Never do both in the same message — two changes read as a new quote, and a new quote starts the thinking again.
Hi [Name], if the full clean is more than you need right now, I can do the [kitchen, bathrooms and floors] for [A$XX] instead. Same day, shorter visit. Say the word and it's yours.
Day 12 — close the door
This is the one people skip, and it is the one that gets replies. It is not rude: you are telling someone that a time you were holding is about to go to someone else. That is information, not pressure.
Hi [Name], I still have [Tue 9am] pencilled in for you, but I have another enquiry asking for that slot. If you want it, reply today and it's yours. Otherwise I'll release it — and you can always come back to me later.
Why the third message works
The first two messages ask the client to do something for you. The third one tells them something is about to change without them. It is also simply true: you were holding the time, and holding a time costs you money.
Four things not to send
- "Just following up." It asks them to remember the context and invent the next step. Say the actual thing instead.
- "Did you get my message?" It makes the silence the subject. Keep the job the subject.
- A discount on day 3. It teaches people that ignoring you is how to get 10% off, and it tells the next client the first price was not real.
- A long message. Anything over four lines reads like homework. The whole sequence should fit on one phone screen.
When to actually stop
After the third message, stop. Mark the job as lost and move on — a fourth message is where a follow-up turns into pressure. If they come back in six weeks, they come back to a clean inbox rather than an awkward thread.
The part nobody mentions
The value of follow-up is not only the jobs you save. It is knowing which quotes are genuinely dead, so the time you were holding stops being imaginary work. Two replies out of ten is a normal rate, and those two are usually the people who were always going to say yes — just later.
The record that makes this repeatable
Keep one line per quote: date sent, amount, the times you offered, and the date of the last message. A notes app is enough. It gives you two things you otherwise cannot have. The day-12 message writes itself, because you can see the time you were holding. And you learn your own answer rate — so if eight out of ten quotes go quiet even after three messages, you know the problem is upstream, in the enquiry, the price, or how fast you replied, and no amount of follow-up wording will fix it.
If quotes go quiet often enough to be a pattern rather than bad luck, the first question is how fast you replied, not what you charged.